SynthesisHealth policy and planning2026
Primary health care networks and impacts in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary healthcare provider networks (PHCPNs) are increasingly recognized as promising strategies to effectively strengthen health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there is limited information on the influence PHCPNs may have on the process and clinical outcomes of health services. This study sought to answer the questions: what is the extent, range, and nature of research on PHCPNs in LMICs, what are the types of PHCPNs described, and what are the processes, e.g. access to care, coverage of health services, quality of care and services, safety of care, and the clinical care outcomes of PHCPNs reported in the published literature? We report on a systematic mixed-methods review on PHCPNs as a strategy to strengthen health systems in LMICs following the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I and Mixed Methods Appraisal tools, while a narrative synthesis was employed to describe the results. Fifteen primary studies were found eligible for the review. From the included papers, eight types of PHCPNs were identified across various contexts and countries. We found that the PHCPNs primarily focus on maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes. The study reveals that: (i) PHCPNs contribute to improvements in the process outcomes of health services by enhancing access to care, coverage of health services, quality of care and services, and safety of care, and (ii) they support improvements in clinical outcomes by helping to reduce maternal, neonatal, and perinatal mortalities and stillbirths. This body of literature we reviewed suggests that PHCPNs make a difference in the process and clinical outcomes of health services in LMICs. This review serves as both a mapping and clarification exercise to promote the adoption of PHCPNs and as a foundation for further research, especially in areas of health services beyond maternal, newborn, and child health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.