Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540717›Full record

SynthesisHealth policy and planning2026

Primary health care networks and impacts in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Dominic Dormenyo Gadeka, Genevieve Cecilia Aryeetey, Helen Bour, Henry Okudzeto, Patrick Addo, Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira Filha, Bassey Ebenso, Helen Elsey, Irene A Agyepong

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dominic Dormenyo GadekaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, University of Ghana School of Public Health, P.O. Box LG13, Legon, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-1583-4572
Genevieve Cecilia AryeeteyDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, University of Ghana School of Public Health, P.O. Box LG13, Legon, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-0530-8675
Helen BourDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, University of Ghana School of Public Health, P.O. Box LG13, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Henry OkudzetoDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, University of Ghana School of Public Health, P.O. Box LG13, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Patrick AddoDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, University of Ghana School of Public Health, P.O. Box LG13, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira FilhaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0730-8561
Bassey EbensoLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, United Kingdom.
Helen ElseyHull and York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Irene A AgyepongFaculty of Public Health, Ghana College of Physicians and Surgeons, P.O. Box MB 429, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

UK government 301132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary healthcare provider networks (PHCPNs) are increasingly recognized as promising strategies to effectively strengthen health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there is limited information on the influence PHCPNs may have on the process and clinical outcomes of health services. This study sought to answer the questions: what is the extent, range, and nature of research on PHCPNs in LMICs, what are the types of PHCPNs described, and what are the processes, e.g. access to care, coverage of health services, quality of care and services, safety of care, and the clinical care outcomes of PHCPNs reported in the published literature? We report on a systematic mixed-methods review on PHCPNs as a strategy to strengthen health systems in LMICs following the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I and Mixed Methods Appraisal tools, while a narrative synthesis was employed to describe the results. Fifteen primary studies were found eligible for the review. From the included papers, eight types of PHCPNs were identified across various contexts and countries. We found that the PHCPNs primarily focus on maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes. The study reveals that: (i) PHCPNs contribute to improvements in the process outcomes of health services by enhancing access to care, coverage of health services, quality of care and services, and safety of care, and (ii) they support improvements in clinical outcomes by helping to reduce maternal, neonatal, and perinatal mortalities and stillbirths. This body of literature we reviewed suggests that PHCPNs make a difference in the process and clinical outcomes of health services in LMICs. This review serves as both a mapping and clarification exercise to promote the adoption of PHCPNs and as a foundation for further research, especially in areas of health services beyond maternal, newborn, and child health.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesPrimary Health CareAccess to Primary CareHealth Services AccessibilityHumansQuality of Health CareResource-Limited Settingshealth outcomeshealth provider networkhealth service deliverylow- and middle-income countriesnetworks of careprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID41540717
PMCPMC12972678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.