ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
How to Tell a Recovery Story 'Professionally'? Issues Related to the Transformation of Personal Stories During a Training for Becoming a Peer Support Worker.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Competencies and Implementation of Peer Support Interventions for People with Serious Mental Health Challenges: A Systematic Review.Harvard review of psychiatryPooled it
- How to Tell a Recovery Story 'Professionally'? Issues Related to the Transformation of Personal Stories During a Training for Becoming a Peer Support Worker.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSharing narratives about recovery is a central activity in peer support work. Researchers have so far investigated many issues related to recovery narratives, but have paid no attention to how the building and sharing of one's story are modified during training courses. This study examines the beliefs of participants in the first national training to become Peer Support Worker (PSW), funded by the Italian Ministry of Health in 2022-23, regarding how to craft their recovery story to make it 'professional'.
methods16 PSWs were interviewed at the end of the course. Implicit theories and beliefs were the focus of the semi-structured interviews. Answers were transcribed and analysed through thematic analysis.
resultsThe training represents a decisive moment for socialising the 'unwritten rules' about how to build and tell personal experiences. Seven main themes emerged: the story-sharing as the most important tool to understand what happened, as a 'passage' of status that changes the feeling between the person and the story through the presence of others, the need for a method for structuring the story, the emotion control as prerequisite for maintaining the right distance between one's story and the user's story-not imposing oneself on the other's experience, the relevance of acting as strategic story director, accepting stories without happy ending and story-sharing for cultural and social change. Results have been discussed with the contribution of PSW, highlighting the potentials and risks.
conclusionsTraining should develop competencies in expressing the story without standardising it, thereby avoiding the reification of the recovery journey into a single version. Story-sharing should not be considered merely as the enactment of a favourable recovery journey; even stories that do not have a happy ending, or that do not adhere to the canons of the 'recovery genre', have dignity and social utility. In a nutshell, the PSW must be helped in becoming the filmmaker of the story rather than the performer of a static script. PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: The PSWs involved played a fundamental role in participating actively by deciding to make available their narratives, reading the results and commenting on them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.