Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540673›Full record

ArticleJournal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence2026

Risk, Adultification, Messaging, and Protection Scale (RAMPS): The development of a measure for Black girls.

Natasha Crooks, Nyssa Snow-Hill, Abigail Bushnell, Kimberly Sanker-Panchal, Gina Sissoko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Colorism and Sexual Health: A Rapid Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  3. Risk, Adultification, Messaging, and Protection Scale (RAMPS): The development of a measure for Black girls.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natasha CrooksUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-2844
Nyssa Snow-HillDePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abigail BushnellDePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kimberly Sanker-PanchalUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Gina SissokoYale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9506-8715

Funding

UIC Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health ProgramK12HD101373 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BUHIMSCHI, IRINA A, MAKI, PAULINE M · 2020 to 2023
$2.9M
Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health K12HD101373-01NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD101373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adultification, protection, and stereotyping of Black girls and their associated sexual and reproductive health risks are understudied concepts that are challenging to measure. This study developed and validated the Risk, Adultification, Messaging, and Protection Scale (RAMPS), designed to assess the relationship between sexual development, adultification, messaging, and protection, which are constructs of the Becoming a Sexual Black Woman framework. Preliminary items were derived from qualitative interviews with Black girls aged 9-18 years old. Adolescent responses (N = 575) to the RAMPS were subjected to several analyses to evaluate the measure's psychometric properties. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) guided by the Becoming a Sexual Black Woman theory were used to test item fit; correlations between the refined measures and theoretically relevant measures were examined for validity; and measurement invariance of the RAMPS was evaluated across three age groups. CFA demonstrated a strong fit for a 3-factor model. The interpretation of the measure was fully invariant across age groups. Findings indicated that the RAMPS represents a valid framework for measuring factors impacting Black girls' sexual development. The final 12-item measure demonstrated respectable to very good internal consistency-adultification (α = .81, very good), protection (α = .76, respectable), messaging (α = .78, respectable), and total protection (α = .80, very good). This paper presents psychometric information about the RAMPS and the full set of items. The next steps will be to validate the measure within a larger sample and to explore its correlation with sexually transmitted infections and HIV risk.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanSexual BehaviorAdolescentChildFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStereotypingSurveys and QuestionnairesadultificationBlack girlsmeasurementmessagingprotectionsexual behavior

Identifiers

PMID41540673
PMCPMC12808862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.