ReviewJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026
Current Uses for Medical Imaging With Orthopaedic Implant Technology.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Uses for Medical Imaging With Orthopaedic Implant Technology.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Musculoskeletal applications have been at the forefront of medical imaging since the first-ever x-ray was taken of a hand. Radiography remains routine in orthopaedics for surgical planning and diagnosing implant complications. Fluoroscopy is used to guide intra-operative implant placement and to assess kinematics of different implants. Computed tomography (CT) is used to develop surgical robotics plans and patient-specific instruments, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can diagnose soft tissue reactions near implants. Ultrasound is less frequently used in orthopaedics but can provide assessments on tendons and ligaments as well as diagnose tissue pathologies. Additional modalities are becoming available that show promise for orthopaedic implant applications, including weight-bearing CT (WBCT), dynamic or four-dimensional CT (4DCT), low field strength (0.55 T) MRI, and positron emission tomography (PET). However, hardware and software costs, scanner accessibility, and high burden for the analyses has limited many of the more advanced imaging techniques to research centres or tertiary care facilities. Across all modalities, computational modelling and artificial intelligence applied to medical images allow more complex uses of imaging data. Time-consuming segmentation tasks can be automated, which allows patient-specific finite element modelling and other types of simulations to be performed more routinely for surgical planning and implant evaluation. Additionally, radiomics can be applied to images to identify implant models and improve diagnoses of implant complications. Metal artifacts near implants are also being reduced by new reconstruction algorithms. Thanks to innovations in medical imaging technology, the care of patients with orthopaedic implants is being improved by enabling more patient-specific interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.