Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540581›Full record

Observational studyJournal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society

Intermittent Catheters With Integrated Features Designed to Reduce the Risk of Urinary Tract Infection: Findings From the Continence Care Registry, a Multinational, Observational, Longitudinal Study.

Daniel Gordon, George Skountrianos, Diane K Newman, Jessica Simmons

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel GordonDaniel Gordon, MS, Global Clinical Affairs Department, Hollister Incorporated, Libertyville, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0001-8059-3608
George SkountrianosDaniel Gordon, MS, Global Clinical Affairs Department, Hollister Incorporated, Libertyville, Illinois.
Diane K NewmanDaniel Gordon, MS, Global Clinical Affairs Department, Hollister Incorporated, Libertyville, Illinois.
Jessica SimmonsDaniel Gordon, MS, Global Clinical Affairs Department, Hollister Incorporated, Libertyville, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this analysis was to compare urinary tract infection (UTI) rates, health-related quality of life (QoL) and intermittent catheter (IC) experience, and satisfaction among participants who used hydrophilic ICs with a ring cap, protective introducer tip, and sleeve (Group A) to those who used ICs without this combination of features (Group B).

designAnalysis of data from a prospective, observational, longitudinal continence care registry. SUBJECTS AND

settingThe sample comprised 222 monthly or quarterly electronic patient-reported outcome registry visits across 32 intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) users from the US, Canada, and the UK. Participants self-reported data directly into a secure cloud-based electronic data capture system.

methodsGeneralized linear mixed models that were capable of modeling the longitudinal nature of the data structure within the registry were employed. These models were used to compare UTI odds, QoL scores based on the Intermittent Self-Catheterization Questionnaire (ISC-Q), and ISC satisfaction and experience ratings between the 2 groups.

resultsGroup A had a significantly lower likelihood of experiencing a UTI than Group B (odds ratio = 0.38; P = .035). Furthermore, total ISC-Q scores for Group A were significantly greater than Group B (P = .044). The ISC-Q difference of 8.85 points exceeded the ISC-Q minimum important difference range of 4.94 to 8.73 points, indicating a clinically relevant difference in QoL for Group A compared to Group B. Additionally, ISC users from Group A reported significantly greater satisfaction and more positive ISC experiences compared to IC users from Group B.

conclusionsParticipants using hydrophilic ICs with a ring cap, protective introducer tip, and sleeve (Group A) demonstrated significantly lower UTI risk, greater QoL, and better ISC satisfaction and experience than participants who used ICs from Group B. These findings indicate the beneficial use of Group A hydrophilic ICs.

Indexed as

Urinary CathetersUrinary Tract InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaEquipment DesignFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRegistriesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomIntermittent cathetersIntermittent self-catheterizationQuality of lifeTouch contaminationUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID41540581
PMCPMC12794708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.