Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540553›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

Passive acoustic monitoring can provide insights into occupancy dynamics and impacts of disturbance for at-risk species.

Jason M Winiarski, Sheila A Whitmore, Connor M Wood, Jonathan P Eiseman, Erin C Netoskie, Matthias E Bieber, H Anu Kramer, Kevin G Kelly, Kate McGinn, Craig Thompson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Passive acoustic monitoring can provide insights into occupancy dynamics and impacts of disturbance for at-risk species.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jason M WiniarskiDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-6324
Sheila A WhitmoreDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Connor M WoodK. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0235-5214
Jonathan P EisemanDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Erin C NetoskieDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Matthias E BieberDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
H Anu KramerDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2014-0070
Kevin G KellyDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Kate McGinnDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4647-1847
Craig ThompsonUSDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Vallejo, California, USA.
Sarah C SawyerUSDA Forest Service, Vallejo, California, USA.
Stefan KahlK. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Holger KlinckK. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
M Zachariah PeeryDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

Arthur Vining Davis FoundationsDeutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt "RangerSound" 39263/01German Federal Ministry of Education and Research "BirdNET+" FKZ 01|S22072German Federal Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety "DeepBirdDetect" FKZ 67KI31040EJake HolshuhNational Fish and Wildlife FoundationUS Forest Service Region 5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate and land-use change are dramatically altering the frequency, intensity, and extent of ecological disturbances, which threaten the persistence of at-risk species. To curb the pace and scale of disturbances, balance management and conservation priorities, and alleviate associated population declines, managers require high-quality information on species' responses to disturbance and their population trends across broad spatial scales that challenge the capacity of traditional, local-scale monitoring programs. Passive acoustic monitoring is a scalable approach to obtain occurrence data, but the extent to which it can be used to model occupancy dynamics and their environmental drivers remains uncertain. Here, we demonstrate how passive acoustic surveys can be analyzed within a Bayesian dynamic occupancy modeling framework to robustly estimate occupancy dynamics and responses to disturbance in the California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis), which is threatened by increasingly large, severe "megafires." From 2021 to 2024, we collected ~2 million hours of audio from autonomous recording units deployed across seven national forests in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Spotted owls were less likely to initially occupy and colonize sites that were severely burned, and more likely to go locally extinct following high-severity fire. Further, we observed declining postfire occupancy trajectories, particularly when sites burned ≥50% high severity. Occupancy trends varied by national forest, but declined by 2% across the entire region. Our findings-which closely align with those from intensive, traditional demographic studies-demonstrate that large-scale passive acoustic monitoring paired with dynamic occupancy models can effectively detect species' responses to disturbance and estimate population trends, offering valuable insights for management across multiple spatial scales. Finally, we provide specific recommendations to help other passive acoustic monitoring programs successfully detect ecological responses to disturbance and track population changes.

Indexed as

AcousticsConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental MonitoringStrigiformesAnimalsBayes TheoremCaliforniaEndangered SpeciesModels, BiologicalPopulation DynamicsBirdNETCalifornia spotted owldisturbancedynamic occupancy modelpassive acoustic monitoringpopulation trendsSierra Nevadathreatened species

Identifiers

PMID41540553
PMCPMC12808558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.