Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540525›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2026

Non-anesthetic Effects of Anesthetics and Organ Protection.

Lucas Gabrovic, Xiaofeng Chen, Han Huang, Hailin Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Therapeutic Potentials of Anesthetics.Current neuropharmacology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucas GabrovicDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
Xiaofeng ChenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Children's Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Han HuangDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Children's Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hailin ZhaoDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

Committee of Healthy Care of Sichuan Province 2024-1702Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province 2024YFFK0252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischaemia reperfusion (I/R) injury is a physiological phenomenon whereby hypoxic tissue damage can be perpetuated by tissue reperfusion; this can occur in the setting of pathology or as a surgical complication. Naturally, tissues sensitive to hypoxic episodes such as the brain, heart, kidney, liver and lung tissue are most often affected. Current treatments for I/R injury focus of limiting the pathological response to reperfusion through ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and medications that mimic the IPC response. Anesthetic preconditioning (APC) and anesthetic postconditioning (APoC) can produce protective responses similar to IPC, thus modulating the effects of I/R injury, with a far longer impact on organ systems than their sedative or analgesic effects. The pathological process and molecular mechanism of I/R injury involve calcium overload, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation, autophagy, and other key signaling pathways. However, how anesthetics are involved remains to be further investigated. Elucidating its underlying mechanism is vital to prevent perioperative I/R injury and benefit our patients. Importantly, the protective mechanisms differ between the types of anesthetics and between types of tissue. Understanding the differences can lead to more informed clinical decisions. Here, we systematically review and compare the molecular mechanisms that can explain how inhalational and intravenous anesthesia regulate I/R injury and provide a comprehensive analysis of recent basic clinical studies for APC and APoC in the context of different organ I/R injury.

Indexed as

AnestheticsIschemic PostconditioningIschemic PreconditioningReperfusion InjuryAnimalsHumansAnestheticsanesthesiacell deathinflammationOrgan injuryorgan protectionpharmacology

Identifiers

PMID41540525
PMCPMC13269958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.