ArticleCurrent drug delivery2026
The Influence of Phyto-Active Incorporated Topical Formulations on Cell Migration in Scratch Assays and
Article in Current drug delivery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVitis vinifera L. seed oil, Trigonella foenum-graecum L. seed oil, and the Olea europaea L. oil macerates of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. flowers and Matricaria recutita L. flowers were used for the preparation of topical wound-healing ointments.
methodsThe ointments basically were prepared by hot-melt blending method and subjected to rheological tests and texture profile analysis. After characterization of in vitro characterization studies, a scratch assay was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of ointment formulations. Ultimately, the optimized formulations underwent further testing on an in vivo burn wound model in mice.
resultsMeasured viscosity values were F1:382.98 Pa.s and F2:2562.3 Pa.s, respectively, and both of the formulations created an easy-to-apply, soft, thin adhesive film layer. The fast wound closure was observed with F1 formulation, and when applied at different doses of 100 μL, 200 μL, and 400 μL, the 200 μL concentration of F1 formulation was able to heal the wound totally (100 %) at 48th hour. DISCUSSION: The F1 formulation presented lower viscosity than the F2; the increase in the white petrolatum concentration increased the initial viscosity as expected. F1 formulation had higher phyto-actives and cera alba and lower petrolatum in comparison to F2. The wound healing effects of both the formulations were synergistic due to their phytoactives content. In in vivo studies, the F1 ointment exhibited faster re-epithelialization with less inflammation compared to the burn control group.
conclusionThe best formulation included oils of H. italicum, M. recutita, V. vinifera, and T. foenum-graecum at a total concentration of 16%, exhibiting appropriate preadability and successful healing property. Additional research needs to be carried out to shed light on the mechanism underlying the formulation's healing capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.