Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540513›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2026

Assessing SICI Cortical Inhibition With DLPFC TMS-EEG Using Different ISI Values.

Gema Mijancos-Martínez, Alejandro Bachiller, Inés Fernández-Linsenbarth, Saúl J Ruiz-Gómez, Sergio Romero, Vicente Molina, Miguel Ángel Mañanas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gema Mijancos-MartínezAutomatic Control Department (ESAII) and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (IRIS), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5594-4821
Alejandro BachillerAutomatic Control Department (ESAII) and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (IRIS), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Inés Fernández-LinsenbarthPsychiatry Department, School of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Saúl J Ruiz-GómezAutomatic Control Department (ESAII) and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (IRIS), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Sergio RomeroAutomatic Control Department (ESAII) and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (IRIS), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Vicente MolinaPsychiatry Department, School of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Miguel Ángel MañanasAutomatic Control Department (ESAII) and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (IRIS), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca FI-2022Fundació la Marató de TV3 202219-30-31Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León GRS 2487/A/22HybridNeuro 101079392Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI22/00465MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 JDC2022-050016-IMICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2023-150654OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of cortical inhibition (CI) in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) has focused great attention in recent years. One of the most common procedures to assess such inhibition is the short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI), a paired-pulse paradigm defined by the interstimulus interval (ISI). While SICI was initially defined and extensively used in studies targeting the motor cortex, its application to the DLPFC is relatively recent. However, little is known about how ISI values affect the DLFPC, especially in terms of the TMS-evoked potentials (TEP). This study aims to quantitatively compare the effects of different ISI values in the SICI protocol on CI in the DLPFC by assessing TEPs. Eighteen healthy subjects underwent the SICI protocol using two different ISIs: 2 ms and 4 ms. TMS-EEG responses for both ISIs were characterized in terms of amplitude, latency, peak-to-peak amplitudes, and the area under the rectified curve of the TEPs. The results indicate that TEPs differed depending on the ISI used, finding a significantly greater inhibition with 2 ms ISI, as reflected by a more pronounced reduction in TEP amplitude. These findings are consistent with previous literature on motor cortex stimulation, suggesting that a greater reduction in TEP, and hence greater inhibition, is likely achieved with a 2 ms ISI. Therefore, the study helps in the standardization of SICI protocol in DLFPC.

Indexed as

Dorsolateral Prefrontal CortexElectroencephalographyNeural InhibitionTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultEvoked PotentialsEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexYoung Adultcortical inhibitionDLPFCinterstimulus intervalSICITMS‐EEG

Identifiers

PMID41540513
PMCPMC12808555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.