ArticlePsychophysiology2026
Assessing SICI Cortical Inhibition With DLPFC TMS-EEG Using Different ISI Values.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing SICI Cortical Inhibition With DLPFC TMS-EEG Using Different ISI Values.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evaluation of cortical inhibition (CI) in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) has focused great attention in recent years. One of the most common procedures to assess such inhibition is the short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI), a paired-pulse paradigm defined by the interstimulus interval (ISI). While SICI was initially defined and extensively used in studies targeting the motor cortex, its application to the DLPFC is relatively recent. However, little is known about how ISI values affect the DLFPC, especially in terms of the TMS-evoked potentials (TEP). This study aims to quantitatively compare the effects of different ISI values in the SICI protocol on CI in the DLPFC by assessing TEPs. Eighteen healthy subjects underwent the SICI protocol using two different ISIs: 2 ms and 4 ms. TMS-EEG responses for both ISIs were characterized in terms of amplitude, latency, peak-to-peak amplitudes, and the area under the rectified curve of the TEPs. The results indicate that TEPs differed depending on the ISI used, finding a significantly greater inhibition with 2 ms ISI, as reflected by a more pronounced reduction in TEP amplitude. These findings are consistent with previous literature on motor cortex stimulation, suggesting that a greater reduction in TEP, and hence greater inhibition, is likely achieved with a 2 ms ISI. Therefore, the study helps in the standardization of SICI protocol in DLFPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.