ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2026
The effect of opioids on the light-off pupillary reflex.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe examined the relationship between modeled opioid concentration and quantitative pupillary measures during remifentanil infusion sequences with particular attention to the "light-off" (LO) reflex.
methodsTen volunteer subjects were recruited to undergo two 10-min remifentanil infusion protocols. Pupillary unrest in ambient light (PUAL) and LO were measured at baseline and every 2.5 min during the first 10-min infusion-25-min recovery sequence, and after a wash-out period, the Neurological Pupillary index (NPi) and LO were measured during an identical infusion-recovery sequence. We tested proportional change in each parameter from baseline as indicators of dynamic opioid effect.
resultsOn average, remifentanil decreased both LO dilation and PUAL by > 85%, decreased pupil diameter by > 48%, but did not significantly alter the NPi. Hypoxia occurred in 15/16 sequences. LO and PUAL both showed excellent discrimination between high-toxic versus zero-moderate opioid effect. In contrast to PUAL and LO, the scaled pupillary light reflex measurement (NPi) was not altered by opioids.
conclusionLO and PUAL were robust indicators of opioid effect and provided equivalent estimates of respiratory depression risk in our healthy awake subjects. Compared with PUAL, LO offers the advantage of being intuitive and easily derived at the bedside without need for specialized software. SIGNIFICANCE: Measurement of the pupillary LO reflex with a portable pupillometer provides a simple, discriminating measure of opioid effect. Remifentanil blocks the pupillary LO reflex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.