ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Generic health-related quality of life instruments among children and adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures are widely used in research and clinical practice; however, their application among children and adolescents in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where most of the world's youth reside remains underexplored. This scoping review aims to identify generic HRQoL instruments used in LMICs and describe their applications and reported psychometric properties.
methodGuided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework, a search for peer-reviewed papers published between 2000 and 2024 was conducted in six databases (Medline, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science). The review included papers reporting the use of generic HRQoL instruments among individuals aged 0-19 years in LMICs.
resultsA total of 152 papers originating from 22 (of 75) LMICs were included. Nearly half of the papers were from India 50 (32.9%) and Egypt 25 (16.5%). Eight generic HRQoL instruments (PedsQL 4.0 GCS, KIDSCREEN-10/27/52, HUI-2/3, EQ-5D-Y-3L/5L, PROMIS-25, PedsQL Short Form (15-items), EQ-5D-3L/5L, and SF-36) were identified. Of these, PedsQL 4.0 GCS was reported in 78% of papers. Only 11 (7.2%) papers reported use of the instruments in the general population, and only one generated population norms. Very few studies 2 (1.3%) included children ≤ 4 years. One-third (34.9%) of the studies included both self- and proxy-reported HRQoL data. Most of the instruments were used for general health assessment (77.6%); only 9.9% of studies evaluated treatment or intervention outcomes, and 12.5% were psychometric studies. None of the psychometric studies assessed all nine measurement properties recommended by COSMIN.
conclusionThe use of generic HRQoL instruments in studies of children and adolescents in LMICs, mainly with PedsQL, has increased in recent years, though almost half of the studies identified were carried out in only two countries. Despite their growing use, gaps remain in population coverage, psychometric evidence, and the geographic distribution of research in LMICs using generic HRQoL instruments. SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol was submitted to Open Science Framework on 24 January 2025. Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MVG62.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.