Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540324›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

Unravelling mechanisms of drought tolerance in a soybean cultivar (Daewonkong roots): insights into integrative transcriptomic and metabolite analyses.

Yo-Han Yoo, Jinsil Yeo, Doheon Choi, Ye-Jin Son, Hyangyeon Jeong, Sangjun Park, Yeon Ju An, Girim Park, Eunsoo Lee, Mi-Suk Seo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yo-Han YooDepartment of Upland Crop Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Upland Crop Breeding Division, National Institute of Crop and Food Science, Miryang, 50424, Republic of Korea.
Jinsil YeoDepartment of Smart Farm Science, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, 17104, Republic of Korea.
Doheon ChoiGraduate School of Green Bio-Science & Crop Biotech Institute, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, 17104, Republic of Korea.
Ye-Jin SonDepartment of Upland Crop Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Upland Crop Breeding Division, National Institute of Crop and Food Science, Miryang, 50424, Republic of Korea.
Hyangyeon JeongDepartment of Upland Crop Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Upland Crop Breeding Division, National Institute of Crop and Food Science, Miryang, 50424, Republic of Korea.
Sangjun ParkDepartment of Upland Crop Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Upland Crop Breeding Division, National Institute of Crop and Food Science, Miryang, 50424, Republic of Korea.
Yeon Ju AnDepartment of Upland Crop Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Upland Crop Breeding Division, National Institute of Crop and Food Science, Miryang, 50424, Republic of Korea.
Girim ParkDepartment of Upland Crop Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Upland Crop Breeding Division, National Institute of Crop and Food Science, Miryang, 50424, Republic of Korea.
Eunsoo LeeDepartment of Upland Crop Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Upland Crop Breeding Division, National Institute of Crop and Food Science, Miryang, 50424, Republic of Korea.
Mi-Suk SeoPlant Biomaterials and Biotechnology Division, Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, 370, Nongsaengmyeong-Ro, Deokjin-Gu, Jeonju City, 54874, Jeonbuk-Do, Korea.
Ju Sung ImDepartment of Upland Crop Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Upland Crop Breeding Division, National Institute of Crop and Food Science, Miryang, 50424, Republic of Korea.
Soo-Kwon ParkDepartment of Upland Crop Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Upland Crop Breeding Division, National Institute of Crop and Food Science, Miryang, 50424, Republic of Korea.
Ki-Hong JungGraduate School of Green Bio-Science & Crop Biotech Institute, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, 17104, Republic of Korea.
Woo-Jong HongDepartment of Smart Farm Science, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, 17104, Republic of Korea. hwj0602@khu.ac.kr.

Funding

Rural Development Administration PJ017429022025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoybean (Glycine max L.), a major food crop in Korea, is highly vulnerable to drought, particularly under rain-fed cultivation. Although several transcriptomic studies have examined drought-responsive pathways in soybean leaves, research on root-specific responses and their association with isoflavone-mediated antioxidant defense remains limited. The Korean cultivar Daewonkong, which is widely cultivated but sensitive to drought, presents a useful candidate for investigating the molecular and metabolic mechanisms of stress susceptibility.

resultsRNA sequencing of Daewonkong roots under controlled and drought-stressed conditions identified 1,348 upregulated and 2,835 downregulated genes. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and MapMan analyses revealed enrichment of galactose, nitrogen, and glutathione metabolism among the upregulated genes, whereas cell wall, lipid, phenylpropanoid, and isoflavonoid biosynthesis were strongly repressed, suggesting a metabolic shift from growth-related processes to stress acclimation. When comparing the drought-sensitive Daewonkong cultivar with the drought-tolerant cultivar PI 471938, clear phenotypic and metabolic differences were observed. PI 471938 displayed a substantially higher survival rate after recovery from drought-induced stress and accumulated 2.5-fold greater levels of total isoflavones. Concurrently, this cultivar exhibited significantly enhanced antioxidant capacity, with higher polyphenol content and stronger radical scavenging activity [2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)] than Daewonkong. Furthermore, several drought-responsive genes, including GmMYB14, GmNFYA13, GmWRKY12, and GmFAD3A, were expressed at high levels in PI 471938, consistent with their roles in oxidative stress mitigation, membrane stability, and transcriptional regulation.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that drought tolerance in soybean is associated with enhanced antioxidant activity, increased isoflavone accumulation, and the coordinated induction of stress-responsive genes. These results provide molecular insights into soybean’s drought adaptation, establishing a foundation for breeding strategies to improve stress resilience.

Indexed as

Glycine maxPlant RootsTranscriptomeDrought ResistanceDroughtsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantIsoflavonesIsoflavonesAntioxidant activityDrought stressIsoflavonesSoybean (Glycine max)Stress-responsive genesTranscriptome analysis

Identifiers

PMID41540324
PMCPMC12892709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.