ReviewPharmaceutical research2026
Bench-to-Bedside Perspectives on Ocular Toxicity of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Toxicology, Clinical Management and Molecule Optimization.
Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe present review aims to provide comprehensive bench-to-bedside insights into ADC-related ocular toxicity for drug designers, pharmaceutical manufacturers, toxicologists, and medical staff, thereby enhancing the safety of ADC therapeutic applications.
methodsThe review comprehensively analyzes the recent progress in the pathological mechanisms of ADC-related ocular toxicity, evaluates existing non-clinical risk assessment strategies based on animal toxicological studies, and highlights future optimization directions. It also summarizes clinical adverse events to demonstrate the typical profile of ocular surface toxicity and provides clinical management strategies.
resultsADC ocular toxicity primarily affects the ocular surface via on-target (antibody-mediated) and off-target (non-specific uptake) mechanisms. Key determinants include payload type (e.g., MMAF and DM4, which exhibit higher toxicity due to intracellular retention), linker properties (cleavable linkers mitigate off-target effects), and ADCs' physicochemical characteristics. Non-clinical models effectively predict corneal injury but poorly recapitulate conjunctival responses. Clinical management relies on early ophthalmic monitoring and dose adjustment, with 42.9%-100% of adverse events being reversible.
conclusionThis review offers valuable insights into ADC ocular toxicity, emphasizing the importance of early-stage selection and optimization of ADCs and their components to reduce ocular toxicity risks. It provides a reference for mitigating ADC-related ocular toxicity risks and facilitates the future development of ADCs with improved safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41540298What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.