ArticlePharmaceutical research2026
From Blood Flow to Tumor Cell Internalization: A Multistage Computational Model of Nanoparticle Dynamics.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the transport of nanoparticles within blood vessels and their distribution in tumor tissues is crucial for the successful implementation of nanotechnological strategies in clinical practice. Although numerous studies have examined nanoparticle transport in blood flow, none have comprehensively investigated all the sequential steps a nanoparticle must undergo prior to internalization by target cells.
methodsA computational framework was developed in COMSOL Multiphysics to simulate nanoparticle (NP) transport from systemic administration through to tumor cell internalization. The model integrates three coupled stages: (1) NP movement within a non-Newtonian blood flow; (2) trans-endothelial transport; and (3) NP motion within the tumor stroma, incorporating affinity forces to capture ligand-receptor interactions. The tumor geometry was reconstructed, including cancer cells and fibroblasts, to reproduce physiological porosity. Multiple case studies were conducted to evaluate the impact of particle density, injection velocity, and size on NP biodistribution.
resultsThe computational model effectively simulates nanoparticle transport across all stages. Notably, it is the first model in the literature to incorporate the affinity of functionalized nanoparticles, which facilitates ligand-receptor interactions for targeted delivery. Simulation outcomes indicate that a low Stokes number is critical for ensuring a higher percentage of particles reach the end of the capillary network. Furthermore, surface modification of nanoparticles with ligands promotes more specific distribution within the stroma, reducing the percentage of nanoparticles that fail to reach target cells by approximately 50%
conclusionsA novel and comprehensive computational model has been developed to include the entire process of nanoparticle distribution following systemic administration, including specific recognition by cellular receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41540296What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.