ArticleScientific reports2026
Prediction of baseline oral microbiota for clinical classification post Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oral microbiota is related to the severity and recovery of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study aims to predict clinical classification after SARS-CoV-2 infection using oral microbiota before infection. Herein, we collected tongue-coating samples before infection and then monitored clinical information after infection. Oral microbiota was detected by MiSeq sequencing. We randomly assigned participants from Zhengzhou into discovery and validation cohorts to develop a predictive model and conducted cross-region verification using Xinyang and Hangzhou cohorts. Sixteen asymptomatic patients (AP), 257 mild patients (MP), 106 common patients (CP), and 7 severe patients (SP) were enrolled. Oral microbiota diversity was decreased in CP versus MP. At genus level, 11 microorganisms, including Rothia and Gemella, were increased, while 5 microorganisms, including Selenomonas and Lachnoanaerobaculum, were decreased in CP versus MP. Moreover, the classifier based on 15 optimal markers showed high prediction efficiency in discovery cohort (area under the curve [AUC]: 98.35%), validation cohort (AUC: 81.91%), Xinyang cohort (AUC: 74.34%), and Hangzhou cohort (AUC: 94.44%). Interestingly, a higher abundance of Selenomonas was associated with milder clinical symptoms. In conclusion, our study established a good model to predict clinical classification after SARS-CoV-2 infection using oral microbiota before infection, providing a novel strategy for precise prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.