Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540208›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2026

Optimizing prostate cancer treatment with MR-guided focused ultrasound: the role of expanded ablation-to-lesion volume ratio.

Rachelle R Bitton, Emily Vertosick, Yash Khandwala, Gena Korol, Andrew Vickers, Behfar Ehdaie, Geoffrey Sonn, Pejman Ghanouni

Abstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachelle R BittonDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. rbitton@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2824-8978
Emily VertosickDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Yash KhandwalaDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Gena KorolInsightec Inc, Dallas, TX, USA.
Andrew VickersDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Behfar EhdaieDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Geoffrey SonnDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Pejman GhanouniDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

NCI NIH HHS P30-CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine which treatment parameters optimize focal therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer by balancing oncologic control with healthy tissue preservation, in a phase 2b multicenter trial of MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS). Additionally, to assess the relationship of ablation volume relative to lesion volume with oncologic outcomes, urinary, and erectile function. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective interpretation of prospectively acquired data, the non-perfused volume (NPV) of prostate tissue encompassing the MRI-visible lesion volume defined the ablation-volume-to-lesion-volume ratio (ALVR). Oncologic efficacy was assessed as the absence of clinically significant (GGG ≥ 2) cancer in the treatment zone at 24-month biopsy. Associations between ALVR and outcomes were assessed using Student's t-tests. Baseline characteristics were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests.

resultsEighty-nine men (mean age, 63 years ± 7) had MRI-visible lesions with a volume of 0.47 mL (IQR: 0.20-0.95), with a surrounding NPV of 6.9 mL (IQR: 5.2-10.4). Men achieving oncologic efficacy had twice the ALVR compared to those with recurrence at the treatment site (17 vs 8, mean difference 8.8, 95% CI: 2.1, 16, p = 0.013). Increasing NPV relative to total prostate volume did not improve oncologic outcomes. Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between men with and without GGG ≥ 2 at 24-month biopsy. ALVR did not differ in men with new erectile dysfunction (mean difference in ALVR: 2.1, 95% CI: -12, 16, p = 0.8) or urinary symptoms (mean difference in ALVR 4.0, 95% CI: -21, 29, p = 0.71).

conclusionsIn patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, higher ALVR was associated with superior 2-year oncologic outcomes without increased risk of urinary or erectile dysfunction. KEY POINTS: Question What treatment parameters optimize focal therapy for prostate cancer by balancing healthy tissue preservation with favorable oncologic outcomes? Findings Patients without residual cancer at 24-month biopsy had twice the ALVR of those with recurrence, with no adverse impact on erectile or urinary function. Clinical relevance While fixed intra-prostatic margins (e.g., 5 mm or 10 mm) are commonly prescribed in focal therapy, this study highlights the importance of scaling the ALVR in the treatment plan to achieve sufficient oncologic coverage.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalProstatic NeoplasmsUltrasound, High-Intensity Focused, TransrectalAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAblationFocal therapyFocused ultrasound (MR-guided)High intensity focused ultrasoundProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.