ArticlePediatric research2026
Structural birth defects and exposure to oil and gas wells during pregnancy.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExposure to unconventional hydraulically fractured oil and gas wells during pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of structural birth defects. These associations have not been examined in California, where most operators use conventional methods that do not use enhanced techniques.
objectivesDetermine whether residing near oil and gas wells during early pregnancy was associated with birth defect risks among San Joaquin Valley, California, residents.
methodsWe conducted a case-control study with data from the California Center of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study for births delivered from 1997-2011. We considered 16 structural birth defect phenotypes. We assessed exposure to active wells within 3 km of the maternal residence or inactive wells within 1 km. We fit adjusted logistic regression models for each exposure and birth defect phenotype.
resultsExposure to active wells was associated with elevated odds of some CHDs and significantly lower odds of atrial septal defect secundum and gastroschisis. Exposure to inactive wells was associated with significantly elevated odds of cleft palate.
conclusionsAmong San Joaquin Valley residents, living near active and inactive wells was associated with risks of birth defects. The estimates were imprecise and, given the number of statistical tests we conducted, may be spurious. IMPACT: Researchers have not yet characterized structural birth defect-related potential risks associated with living near conventional wells in California, and there is little understanding of the hazards associated with inactive wells. We found that living near active wells in the San Joaquin Valley, California, was associated with risk of some structural birth defects, but findings were imprecise. Living near inactive wells was associated with an elevated risk of cleft lip and cleft palate. Further research could help determine whether findings were valid and explicate plausible etiological pathways.
Identifiers
41540200What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.