ArticleScientific reports2026
Multiparametric comparative assessment of surgical efficacy in patients with SUI and POP versus normal controls.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the anatomical outcomes of transobturator tension-free sling combined with posterior pelvic reconstruction in patients with stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. This study included 50 women with stage II POP and SUI who underwent the combined surgery, along with 10 matched healthy controls. Preoperative and postoperative pelvic floor morphology was assessed via MRI, measuring parameters including perineal body area, urethral length, levator hiatus dimensions, vaginal angles, and spatial coordinates of key anatomical landmarks. Postoperative MRI demonstrated significant restoration of pelvic floor anatomy: perineal body area increased (572.84 ± 90.42 mm² vs. preoperative 306.24 ± 90.33 mm², P < 0.001), urethral length extended (37.89 ± 4.70 mm vs. 31.58 ± 4.12 mm, P < 0.001), and levator hiatus parameters normalized. Vaginal axial deviations and landmark coordinates were effectively corrected, showing statistical improvement compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05) and restoration to levels comparable with controls. The TOT combined with posterior pelvic reconstruction effectively restores pelvic floor anatomy and biomechanical balance, providing an objective imaging basis for the anatomical restoration achieved by this procedure in treating SUI with POP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.