SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2026
Protocols and safety profile of convection enhanced delivery in pediatric patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Emerging Role of Ferroptosis in Pediatric Cancer Biology and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a developmental drug delivery system enabling direct, intraparenchymal placement of therapeutics that bypass the blood-brain barrier. This systematic review aggregates and outlines the available data surrounding current applications and adverse events of pediatric CED to benchmark safety as protocols expand. A comprehensive search through CINAHL, Cochrane, OVID Medline, and Scopus databases was conducted using a modified PRISMA analysis. After deduplication and screening, final articles were selected for data extraction. Of 108 unique articles, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 162 patients (51% males, 44% females, and 5% not reported). The average age was 8.64 years (range 5-14.1 years). The most common indication for CED was for unresectable high-grade glioma (92%), predominantly diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (83%). CED also addressed genetic enzyme deficiency (8%). The trans-frontal approach was most common (58%), with single catheter systems employed in 50% of studies. A total of 285 adverse events were reported. The most common included headache (20%), limb weakness (18.2%), Grade 1 cranial nerve deficits (6.3%), and general pain (4.9%). Of 132 CTCAE-graded events, 125 were Grade 1 or Grade 2 (94.7%) and 7 were Grade 3 (5.3%). No Grade 4 or Grade 5 adverse events occurred. This first systematic review of CED of pediatric patients demonstrates that while mild side effects are common, severe adverse events are rare. Multi-institutional and longitudinal data are needed to further define CED's role in pediatric applications. These findings support CED as a viable platform for investigational therapies in treatment-resistant pediatric pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.