ArticleScientific data2026
Ecological Integrity Index, timely annual tracking of biodiversity change.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite numerous global initiatives and policy framework to mitigate ongoing biodiversity decline, progress remains limited due to lack of biodiversity indicators that are timely, scientifically rigorous, and representative. Furthermore, databases underlying previous indicators are spatially, temporally, geographically and taxonomically biased, making it difficult to track biodiversity change dynamics and set proper biodiversity targets. Here, we constructed a new version of the global human footprint, and used it to infer temporally explicit annual shifting patterns of biodiversity across all scales by incorporating remote sensing and mapping out human pressures. This indicator (the Ecological Integrity Index- EII) successfully differentiates high- and low- biodiversity biomes, especially for deserts and tundra. Moreover, shifting annual patterns can identify global hotspots (e.g., major rainforests and regional hotspots), and shows biodiversity change dynamics at regional level based on estimating biodiversity change over time. Changes of evolving human footprint were further analyzed with relationships to biodiversity patterns. At more a local level, the patterns perfectly reflect biodiversity and intactness. Compared to other indicators (e.g., BII, BHI) in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) and biodiversity models (e.g., GLOBIO), the EII can better reflect biodiversity. EII shows a good performance, with the potential to inform biodiversity conservation efforts, and support the implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.