ArticleScientific reports2026
Pediatric diabetes prediction using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Effective Model-Based Voting Classifier for Diabetes Mellitus Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes is a chronic condition that affects a substantial portion of the global population and is linked to elevated mortality rates and a range of severe health complications. Despite its clinical importance, progress in diabetes research is often constrained by the limited availability of comprehensive datasets and robust predictive models. To address these challenges, researchers are increasingly turning to big data analytics and machine learning (ML) methodologies. This study presents the development of an ML-based system aimed at predicting the likelihood of diabetes and classifying its various types. A novel dataset, termed Diabetes Types Dataset, was constructed by integrating four heterogeneous dataset sources: paediatrics data from the Mansoura University Children Hospital repository, the Pima Indian Diabetes (PIMA) dataset, the Pone dataset, and a Gestational Diabetes dataset. The classification of diabetes types was approached as a multiclass problem using a suite of supervised ML algorithms, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Decision Trees, Adaptive Boosting, Random Forests, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machines, and K-Nearest Neighbors. Model performance was evaluated using several metrics: Accuracy, Precision, Mean Squared Error, and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. Among the models tested, the ANN classifier demonstrated the highest accuracy, achieving a peak performance of 99.98%. Further validation was conducted using an external dataset referred to as diabetes_prediction, which confirmed the model's robustness with consistent accuracy. Additionally, the proposed system was applied to a publicly available dataset, diabetes_Dataset, containing 34 features used to predict 12 distinct types of diabetes efficiently. The results suggest that this ML-driven approach can significantly enhance the ability of healthcare professionals to detect and classify diabetes types, thereby supporting early intervention and improved disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.