Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540064›Full record

ArticleNPJ microgravity2026

A demographic comparison of NASA astronauts and commercial spaceflight participants.

Katie J Hogan, Emmanuel Urquieta, Robert J Reynolds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ microgravity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katie J HoganBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Emmanuel UrquietaUniversity of Central Florida College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA.
Robert J ReynoldsUniversity of Central Florida College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA. rreynolds@mortalityresearch.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accelerated pace of commercial spaceflight is rapidly increasing the number of civilian spaceflight participants (SFP). In this study, SFPs were shown to be older with a broader age range than NASA astronauts, and have more diverse educational backgrounds and occupations. K-means clustering using demographic data showed that NASA astronauts fall broadly into categories reflecting military pilot training versus non-pilots, often scientists and engineers. Conversely, SFPs fall into five categories we label as Professional Astronauts, Veteran Adventurers, Young Adventurers, Celebrities, and Science Tourists. Overall, these SFPs are a more diverse and globally representative population than traditional governmental astronauts, and the demographics of each cohort directly reflect the mission objectives of their respective agencies and companies. Demographics provide insight into the goals and priorities of both governmental and commercial spaceflight organizations, and further investigation of these trends will be important as human spaceflight continues to change in the decades to come.

Identifiers

PMID41540064
PMCPMC12894856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.