ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2026
Clinician Perceptions of Phonatory-Respiratory Kinematic Patterns in Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia.
Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAltered respiratory kinematics are thought to contribute to primary muscle tension dysphonia (pMTD) symptoms such as vocal effort, fatigue, and discomfort. Although speech-language pathologists (SLPs) often comment on respiratory patterns during voice evaluations, it remains unclear which visual-perceptual cues they rely on for clinical decision-making and how accurate these patterns are for identifying patients with pMTD. As such, this study aimed to (1) identify the respiratory patterns SLPs perceive in pMTD and (2) evaluate their diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing pMTD from vocally healthy controls.
methodsForty-six participants (21 pMTD, 25 controls) performed voice tasks varying in intensity and articulatory complexity, while six synchronized cameras captured perilaryngeal-respiratory movements. Five blinded, fellowship-trained SLPs rated breathing normality, severity (0-10), presence of pMTD (Y/N), and confidence (0-10). Open-ended responses were analyzed using natural language processing (NLP) and reflexive content analysis (RCA).
resultsNLP analysis identified five visual-perceptual respiratory features: abdominal, anterior neck tension, clavicular, thoracic, and suboptimal breathing-none of which reliably distinguished pMTD from vocally healthy controls (average diagnostic accuracy = 60%; d' ≤ 1.04). RCA methods yielded three categories: Observable Features of Movement and Breathing, Perceived Patient Experiences, and Interpreting and Evaluating Data.
conclusionObservable respiratory patterns were inconsistently linked to diagnostic accuracy. Visual observation alone appears insufficient for reliably identifying pMTD, underscoring the need for multimodal physiological approaches to improve diagnostic specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.