ArticleJMIR mental health2026
Navigating the Digital Landscape for Potential Use of Mental Health Apps in Clinical Practice: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global demand for mental health services has significantly increased over the past decade, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital resources, particularly smartphone apps, offer a flexible and scalable means of addressing the research-to-practice gap in mental health care. Clinicians play a crucial role in integrating these apps into mental health care, although practitioner-guided digital interventions have traditionally been considered more effective than stand-alone apps.
objectiveThis scoping review explored mental health practitioners' views on potential use or integration of smartphone apps into clinical practice. We asked, "What is known about how mental health practitioners view the integration of smartphone apps into their practice?" Further, this scoping review explored the factors that might influence integration of smartphone apps into practice, such as practitioner and client characteristics, app design and functionality, and practitioner views.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of 3 databases that yielded 38 studies published between 2018 and 2025, involving 1894 participants across various mental health disciplines, most predominantly psychologists and psychiatrists. Data were collected on practitioner and client characteristics, app functionality, and factors deemed important or influencing practitioners' opinions about app integration.
resultsThe included studies were most likely to explore use of apps outside the clinical session and focused on self-management apps for mental health monitoring and tracking, and for collecting data from the patient. Fewer studies explored use of apps within-session, or practitioner-guided apps. Practitioners prioritized app features aligned with the American Psychological Association's evaluation criteria, with practitioners prioritizing engagement and interoperability, but also noted the importance of training and resourcing to support integration.
conclusionsWhile practitioners recognize the potential of apps in mental health care, integration into clinical practice remains limited. This study highlights the need for further research on practical implementation, clinical effectiveness, and practitioner training to facilitate the transition from potential to actual use of apps in mental health care settings. Recommendations include evaluating effectiveness of app integration through experimental studies and developing training modules to develop practitioners' digital competencies and confidence in app use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.