Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41539573›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Simultaneous bright- and black-blood three-dimensional whole-heart magnetic resonance imaging for integrated coronary plaque detection and luminal stenosis assessment: A prospective comparison with coronary computed tomography angiography.

Simon J Littlewood, Natalie Montarello, Reza Hajhosseiny, Michael G Crabb, Dongyue Si, Sophie Quick, Anastasia Fotaki, Karl P Kunze, Ronak Rajani, Claudia Prieto and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Simon J LittlewoodSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Natalie MontarelloCardiovascular Directorate, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Reza HajhosseinySchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Michael G CrabbSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dongyue SiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sophie QuickDepartment of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Anastasia FotakiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Karl P KunzeSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MR Research Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare Limited, Camberley, United Kingdom.
Ronak RajaniSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Cardiovascular Directorate, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Claudia PrietoSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Millennium Institute for Intelligent Healthcare Engineering, Santiago, Chile.
René M BotnarSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Millennium Institute for Intelligent Healthcare Engineering, Santiago, Chile; Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany. Electronic address: rene.botnar@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is a first-line test for anatomical evaluation of the coronary arteries in stable chest pain. Despite technical advances, CCTA requires breath hold and exposes patients to ionizing radiation and contrast agents. Coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CCMRA) has been limited by long and unpredictable scan times, lower spatial resolution, and restricted plaque characterization. We developed a novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequence, Bright-blood and black-blood phase SensiTive (BOOST) sequence, which produces a co-registered bright-blood image for lumen visualization and a T1-weighted black-blood image for vessel wall and plaque assessment from a single scan with predictable scan times.

objectivesTo compare the BOOST-CCMRA sequence with CCTA for plaque characterization and stenosis evaluation in patients with stable chest pain.

methodsSixty consecutive patients (mean age 56 years, 60% (36/60) male) with stable chest pain were prospectively enrolled. All underwent CCTA followed by BOOST-CCMRA on a 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Coronary plaques identified on CCTA were analyzed on the black-blood BOOST image using the signal from plaque to derive the plaque-to-myocardium ratio (PMR); a healthy vessel-to-myocardium ratio (HVMR) was derived as reference. Plaque morphology was assessed by CCTA appearance. Luminal stenosis was assessed on BOOST bright-blood images and compared with CCTA.

resultsOf 60 patients, 35 had plaque on CCTA, with 72 plaques identified. 9 plaques were not detected on BOOST, giving an 88% (63/72) detection success. BOOST showed agreement with CCTA in stenosis grading for 51 of 63 lesions (81%): 23/26 (88%) minimal, 20/24 (83%) mild, 4/7 (57%) moderate, 3/5 (60%) severe, and 1/1 (100%) occlusion. PMR was significantly higher than HVMR (0.64 ± 0.16 vs 0.36 ± 0.11; p < 0.001) across all plaque subtypes (calcified 0.53 ± 0.11, partially calcified 0.70 ± 0.15, non-calcified 0.69 ± 0.16, all p < 0.001 vs HVMR). Hypertension and family history of premature cardiovascular disease were associated with higher PMR values.

conclusionThe BOOST sequence allows simultaneous evaluation of coronary lumen and plaque characteristics in a single non-contrast CCMRA acquisition, with reliable plaque identification and good agreement with CCTA for stenosis severity assessment. This approach may offer free-breathing alternative, without radiation or contrast, for integrated anatomical and plaque imaging in patients with stable chest pain.

Indexed as

Angina, StableComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance AngiographyPlaque, AtheroscleroticAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesCMRCoronary artery diseaseCoronary plaqueStable chest pain

Identifiers

PMID41539573
PMCPMC13168763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.