ArticleCell reports methods2026
Epigenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic characterization of breast cancer cell line reference samples.
Article in Cell reports methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven circRNA vaccine development: multimodal collaborative optimization and a new paradigm for biomedical applications.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing requires accuracy, reproducibility, and standardized reference materials. The Sequencing Quality Control (SEQC-2) multicenter studies on paired breast cancer and B cell lines generated extensive genomic datasets, but integrated epigenomic and proteomic references remain limited. Here, we performed Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq), Methyl-seq, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and proteomic profiling to establish comprehensive multi-omics reference materials. We identified >7,700 protein groups, with 95% of genes encoding a single peptide isoform. Protein expression from CpG island (CGI)-overlapping transcripts was higher than non-CGI transcripts in both cell lines. Certain SNVs were incorporated into mutated peptides. Chromatin accessibility was regulated by CG density: CG-rich regions showed lower methylation, greater accessibility, and higher gene/protein expression, whereas CG-poor regions exhibited higher methylation, reduced accessibility, and cell line-specific expression patterns. These datasets provide well-defined genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic characterizations that can serve as benchmarks for validating omics assays and bioinformatics methods, offering a valuable community resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.