ArticleEuropean journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology2026
Values elicitation among surgical oncologists: Findings from an international survey.
Article in European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "It Depends on the Situation": Variability in How Surgical Oncologists Elicit and Integrate Patient Values.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundValues elicitation, the structured process of clarifying what matters most to patients, is essential to patient-centered care in surgical oncology. This study examined how surgeons elicit, document, and incorporate patient values into surgical decision-making in clinical practice.
methodsWe conducted a 26-question international online survey (May-June 2025) assessing self-reported values elicitation practices among surgical oncologists, focusing on timing, methods, documentation, communication, and preparedness. The survey was distributed through professional networks using convenience and snowball sampling methods, wherein participants were recruited directly or referred by peers. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, and free-text answers were thematically analyzed.
resultsNinety-one surgical oncologists responded to the survey. Most were male (n = 40, 56 %) and White (n = 52, 74 %), specializing in gastrointestinal (n = 32, 44 %), breast (n = 24, 33 %), or skin/soft tissue (n = 24, 33 %) oncology. Most reported eliciting patient values (n = 69, 87 %) and initiating values conversations (n = 52, 73 %). Surgeons reported documenting values (n = 55, 77 %) in the electronic health record and communicating them during tumor boards (n = 50, 83 %). Most surgeons (n = 48, 67 %) reported that patient values influenced recommendations in fewer than 25 % of cases. Nearly all (n = 69, 97 %) reported navigating treatment recommendations that conflicted with patients' values. Narrative responses identified three strategies: direct questioning, goals-of-care framing, and shared decision-making dialogue. Time constraints (n = 50, 70 %) and limited training (n = 19, 27 %) were key barriers. Most (n = 66, 93 %) felt prepared, yet 78 % (n = 56) desired additional training.
conclusionsWhile values elicitation was widely reported by surgical oncologists, it often did not influence surgical recommendations. Findings highlight the need to re-evaluate approaches and training for integrating patient values in surgical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.