ArticleAnnals of plastic surgery2026
Patient Choice: Autonomy and Ethics in Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Annals of plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractBreasts hold multifaceted significance in modern society, encompassing elements of motherhood, sexuality, and female identity. Diseases of the breast can thus result in uniquely complex decision making, particularly in the case of malignancy when mastectomy is indicated. Patient narratives reveal the profound impact of breast loss on self-perception, femininity, and community belonging. Although post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is empirically well supported, intersecting societal pressures and surgeon biases may challenge the autonomy of patients deciding on reconstructive options.This article critically examines various factors involved in decision-making in breast reconstruction following mastectomy, highlighting the significance of patient autonomy. We excavate the historical, sociocultural, and economic influences that may have tilted the current balance in favor of breast reconstruction. While considering the benefits of this shift, we examine the potential existing biases that may influence patient decisions. We emphasize that autonomy is a central ethical consideration in navigating complex reconstructive decisions and promoting patient-centered care. We hope that our work will contribute to a broader discussion on the value placed on breasts and reinforce the agency breast cancer survivors have in decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.