Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41538781›Full record

ArticleAnnals of plastic surgery2026

Patient Choice: Autonomy and Ethics in Breast Reconstruction.

Nikita Bastin, Mariam Saad, Carrie A Kubiak, Brian C Drolet

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikita BastinFrom the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.
Mariam SaadDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Carrie A KubiakDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Brian C DroletDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractBreasts hold multifaceted significance in modern society, encompassing elements of motherhood, sexuality, and female identity. Diseases of the breast can thus result in uniquely complex decision making, particularly in the case of malignancy when mastectomy is indicated. Patient narratives reveal the profound impact of breast loss on self-perception, femininity, and community belonging. Although post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is empirically well supported, intersecting societal pressures and surgeon biases may challenge the autonomy of patients deciding on reconstructive options.This article critically examines various factors involved in decision-making in breast reconstruction following mastectomy, highlighting the significance of patient autonomy. We excavate the historical, sociocultural, and economic influences that may have tilted the current balance in favor of breast reconstruction. While considering the benefits of this shift, we examine the potential existing biases that may influence patient decisions. We emphasize that autonomy is a central ethical consideration in navigating complex reconstructive decisions and promoting patient-centered care. We hope that our work will contribute to a broader discussion on the value placed on breasts and reinforce the agency breast cancer survivors have in decision making.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChoice BehaviorDecision MakingMammaplastyMastectomyPersonal AutonomyFemaleHumansbreast reconstructionethicsmastectomypatient autonomy

Identifiers

PMID41538781
PMCPMC12928790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.