Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41538746›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2026

Potential Impact of the Medicare Prescription Payment Plan for Medicare Part D Beneficiaries With a Cancer Diagnosis.

Aryana Sepassi, Scott D Ramsey, A Mark Fendrick, Nico Gabriel, Jason A Zell, Dana B Mukamel, Sean D Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aryana SepassiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice & Sciences, University of California, San Diego Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, La Jolla, CA.ORCID 0009-0004-1842-0174
Scott D RamseyHutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0001-5972-8280
A Mark FendrickDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Nico GabrielDepartment of Pharmacy Practice & Sciences, University of California, San Diego Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, La Jolla, CA.
Jason A ZellDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-2661-904X
Dana B MukamelDepartment of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, iTEQC Research Program, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-4147-5785
Sean D SullivanThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics Institute, University of Washington, School of Pharmacy, Seattle, WA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo address high out-of-pocket (OOP) medication costs among Medicare Part D beneficiaries, the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act introduced the Medicare Prescription Payment Plan (M3P), a voluntary program that allows beneficiaries to spread OOP costs over the calendar year. We examined M3P's potential impact among beneficiaries with cancer, who frequently incur substantial early-year Part D medication costs. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe evaluated a 2022 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries with a cancer diagnosis and ≥1 fill for a cancer-indicated Part D medication. We estimated 2025-adjusted annual true OOP spending and median monthly beneficiary OOP payment obligations with and without M3P enrollment. Subgroup analyses were performed by demographics, nonadherence status in 2022, and Part D benefit phase.

resultsAmong 168,480 beneficiaries with cancer, most were diagnosed with breast (47.6%), dermatologic (17.6%), or prostate (13.3%) cancers. Overall, 46.7% were projected to reach catastrophic coverage in 2025, with 32.4% doing so in January. Breast (29.7%), prostate (21.20%), and hematologic (20.0%) cancers were most common among those reaching catastrophic coverage. Overall, 43.0% were nonadherent to cancer-indicated Part D medications, with 31.5% reaching catastrophic coverage in January 2025. M3P reduced beneficiary payment obligation variability, especially among those reaching the catastrophic phase in January (IQR, $1,798 US dollars [USD] no M3P

conclusionEarly-year entry into catastrophic coverage is common among beneficiaries with certain high-cost cancers. M3P may most effectively reduce financial burden when enrollment occurs before January. Targeted outreach from cancer care teams and Part D plans to nonadherent patients and those considering costly therapies could maximize program impact and improve treatment outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID41538746
PMCPMC12931864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.