ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
Individual factors associated with the use of oral health services by adults according to sex: a structural equation modeling approach.
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated individual factors associated with the use of oral health services by Brazilian adults according to sex. This cross-sectional analysis used secondary data from the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey. Data from 65,803 adults aged 18-59 years were included. The outcome was "the use of oral health services". Independent variables were grouped into three constructs: sociodemographic data as predisposing factors, economic and access-related characteristics as capacity factors, and data on oral health conditions as need factors. Data were analyzed in Stata 15.0, using the structural equation modeling. Structural models were estimated for males and females. Analysis stratified by sex presented adequate adjustment indicators: comparative fit index > 0.90, Tucker-Lewis index > 0.90, and standardized root mean square residual < 0.05. The final models showed that predisposing factors effected capacity factors (β = 0.61 for men; β = 0.54 for women), which, in turn, directly affected need factors (β = -0.24 for men; β = -0.26 for women) and the outcome (β = 0.23 for men; β = 1.15 for women). The final structural model demonstrated a good fit, with need factors also directly affecting the outcome (β = 0.10 for men; β = 0.09 for women). All coefficients were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The use of oral health services was indirectly influenced by sociodemographic factors, and directly and indirectly influenced by economic and access-related factors. Oral health conditions had a direct effect on service use, with no variation between sexes. However, men were more affected by predisposing and capacity factors than women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.