ArticleSimulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare2026
Novel Simulation With 3D-Printed Spine for Teaching Durotomy Repair: A Technique Guide and Validation Study.
Article in Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDurotomies can lead to cerebrospinal fluid leakage, resulting in various complications. Repairing a durotomy is an essential skill for orthopedic and neurosurgical trainees, but the learning process can be challenging. Therefore, there is a need for effective simulators that allow surgical trainees to practice the technique in a controlled environment without endangering patient safety.
methodsThis study describes the development of a novel 3-dimensional (3D) printed simulation model designed for teaching the repair of intraoperative durotomies to surgical trainees. Junior and senior residents, fellows, and attending spine surgeons used the simulation. Inter- and intragroup performance was examined.
resultsA novel durotomy repair simulation model with lumbar and thoracic windows was developed using 3D-printed and repurposed components to create a lifelike representation of an in vivo intraoperative scenario. Senior residents, fellows, and attendings outperformed junior residents at the initial attempt. All groups improved with repeated exposure to the simulator.
conclusionsThe model offers surgical trainees a controlled environment to practice technical skills without increasing risk for patients or prolonging surgical cases. The model demonstrated its validity by showing that more senior participants outperformed junior residents during their initial attempts. Performance improvement across all groups with repeated exposure indicates that the model not only tests a relevant and realistic skill set, but also facilitates skill development over time. Given the challenges associated with intraoperative training as well as the complications associated with durotomies, the proposed simulator has the potential to benefit surgical trainees and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.