Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41538529›Full record

ArticleDental press journal of orthodontics2026

Impact of orthodontic appliances on patients' daily lives: a comparison between clear aligners and fixed appliances.

Priscilla Carvalhal de Oliveira, Beatriz de Souza Vilella, Mariana Martins E Martins, Cláudia Trindade de Mattos, Vanessa de Couto Nascimento, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Priscilla Carvalhal de OliveiraFluminense Federal University, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics (Niterói/RJ, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3749-3625
Beatriz de Souza VilellaFluminense Federal University, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics (Niterói/RJ, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5412-6037
Mariana Martins E MartinsFluminense Federal University, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics (Niterói/RJ, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1237-1947
Cláudia Trindade de MattosFluminense Federal University, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics (Niterói/RJ, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-0680
Vanessa de Couto NascimentoVeiga de Almeida University, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics (Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-7151
Oswaldo de Vasconcellos VilellaFluminense Federal University, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics (Niterói/RJ, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6931-3094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the impact of treatment with clear aligners versus conventional fixed appliances on the daily lives of orthodontic patients during the first six months and the last six months of treatment.

methodsThe study involved 112 adult patients who were divided into four groups. All participants completed the "Dental Impacts on Daily Living" (DIDL) questionnaire, which included 36 questions and covered five domains including appearance, pain, comfort, general performance and eating/chewing. Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney test were used to analyze the total the scores for each domain, while Fisher's exact test was used to compare the groups regarding the frequency of "dissatisfied", "relatively satisfied", and "satisfied" responses.

resultsThe results showed no significant differences (p>0.05) in the total scores or in the scores for each domain, except for the "General performance/Interpersonal relationship" domain during the initial and final phases of treatment with fixed appliances, indicating that patients adapted to the appliance over time. The initial phase of treatment with fixed appliances presented the highest percentage of dissatisfaction.

conclusionBoth treatments showed a decrease in the level of dissatisfaction reported by patients between the initial and final stages, indicating that adaptation is a crucial factor in the impact of orthodontic appliances on patients' daily lives. Therefore, orthodontists must be especially attentive to the needs of patients in the period immediately after the device is installed.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingOrthodontic Appliances, FixedOrthodontic Appliances, RemovableAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleOrthodontic Appliance DesignPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41538529
PMCPMC12788501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.