ArticleDental press journal of orthodontics2026
Influence of low viscosity resin infiltrant on the adhesion of orthodontic attachments.
Article in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe search for materials and techniques that promote better adhesion to enamel previously affected by carious lesions has intensified in orthodontics, especially with the use of infiltrating resins and composites with different characteristics.
objectiveTo evaluate the adhesion of orthodontic attachments made with different composites bonded to previously infiltrated enamel.
methodsNinety bovine lower incisors were randomly divided into 6 groups (n=15): 1 control Z350 (group C) and 5 experimental: Z350 (group Z), bulk fill - 3M (group FM), bulk fill flow - 3M (group FFM), bulk fill - FGM (group FF), bulk fill flow - FGM (FFF). Each group differed by the type of composite used to attachment. Only the experimental groups were subjected to cariogenic challenge followed by treatment with Icon, a low viscosity resinous infiltrant. After aging, orthodontic attachments were bonded to all specimens (n=90) and a mechanical shear bond strength test was performed with subsequent analysis of the adhesive remnant index (ARI). Data were analyzed using Jamovi software version 2.3 with a significance level of 5%. Descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations), normality test and ANOVA/Tukey for shear variables and Kruskal-Wallis test for ARI were performed.
resultsThe control group required greater force to shear the attachment (100N ± 32.6; p= 0.016), while the group that used the Bulk Fill Flow FGM composite required less force (55.6N ± 22.5; p= 0.016).
conclusionThe presence of resin infiltrant influenced the adhesion of orthodontic attachments, made with different composites. However, it did not interfere with ARI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.