Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41538390›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Effects of an information shock on registry-based health indicators: Evidence from a Swedish PFAS crisis.

Mikael Elinder, Oscar Erixson, Erik Grönqvist, Sophie Langenskiöld, Mattias Öhman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mikael ElinderDepartment of Economics, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Oscar ErixsonCentre for Health Economics Research (HEFUU), Uppsala University, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3929-9906
Erik GrönqvistCentre for Health Economics Research (HEFUU), Uppsala University, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6209-4407
Sophie LangenskiöldCentre for Health Economics Research (HEFUU), Uppsala University, Sweden.
Mattias ÖhmanCentre for Health Economics Research (HEFUU), Uppsala University, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0276-9265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates how the public announcement of very high levels of the toxic chemicals PFAS in the drinking water in Kallinge, Sweden, impacted the health of local residents. By leveraging the unexpected timing of the announcement and utilizing high-frequency individual-level healthcare data, we can isolate the effects of the information shock independently of any toxic effects of PFAS exposure. Despite numerous reports of distress and concern among those affected, our analysis reveals no significant increase in health care utilization following the announcement, as measured by prescription drug use and specialist healthcare visits. This finding holds true even when specifically examining mental health-related care, prescriptions of antidepressants, and sleeping medications. Overall, our results suggest that both the affected community and public authorities managed the situation effectively, mitigating potential health consequences related to anxiety.

Indexed as

RegistriesWater Pollutants, ChemicalDrinking WaterHumansSwedenDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID41538390
PMCPMC12806844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.