ArticleMMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report2026
Imported Human Rabies - Kentucky and Ohio, 2024.
Article in MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human rabies cases are rare in the United States; most result from domestic wildlife exposure. U.S. residents can acquire rabies abroad, typically through contact with dogs in areas where dog-maintained rabies is endemic. In November 2024, a man from Haiti was admitted to a Kentucky hospital with an 8-day history of progressive lower extremity pain and weakness. Soon after admission, he experienced hypersalivation, dysphagia, agitation, and eventually, respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Ten days after admission, he was transferred to a referral hospital in Ohio, where his condition further deteriorated. Despite early consideration of rabies in the differential diagnosis, testing was delayed until late in the clinical course while other diagnostic possibilities were pursued. Rabies testing was initiated on the 29th hospital day and was confirmed 5 days later; the patient died that day. Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleoprotein gene supported acquisition of a dog-maintained rabies virus variant in Haiti. In total, 709 possible contacts during the patient's infectious period underwent risk assessment; 60 (8%) were recommended to receive rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) because of exposure to saliva. Before the patient's rabies diagnosis, standard precautions were used inconsistently during his care; among 60 persons recommended to receive PEP, 52 (88%) were health care workers. Earlier rabies diagnosis and regular adherence to standard infection control precautions, recommended for all patient care, might have reduced health care-associated exposures. This case underscores the importance of early public health consultation upon clinical suspicion of rabies and universal adherence to standard precautions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.