SynthesisBlood advances2026
Antileukemic therapies for older adults with AML ineligible for conventional therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractOlder adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are often ineligible for conventional "7+3" induction chemotherapy. Despite recent drug approvals, treatment outcomes remain poor in this population. We conducted an updated systematic review to inform the 2025 American Society of Hematology (ASH) AML update guidelines in older adults. This review compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), azacitidine (AZA), 5- and 10-day decitabine (DEC), and gemtuzumab ozogamicin, alone or combined with drugs such as venetoclax (VEN), in older adults with AML ineligible for conventional chemotherapy. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies (NRSs) of adults aged ≥55 years with AML, and synthesized evidence on mortality, remission, quality of life (QoL), functional status, and severe toxicity. We applied GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation) to assess the certainty of evidence. We included 47 studies (30 RCTs and 17 NRSs). AZA or LDAC combined with VEN probably reduces mortality and improves remission and QoL. AZA plus isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) inhibitors may reduce 1-year mortality and improve remission and survival in patients with IDH1-mutated AML. Compared with DEC alone, combining DEC with other agents showed inconsistent effects with mostly low certainty of conclusions. VEN combinations showed promising effects on mortality and remission but lacked data on QoL and functional status. In older adults with AML ineligible for conventional therapy, evidence suggests that hypomethylating agents or LDAC combined with VEN likely improves survival and remission outcomes. Treatment decisions should consider patient goals and functional status. These findings informed 8 recommendations in updated ASH-AML guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.