ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Microvascular architecture and physiological fluctuations constrain the control of cerebral microcirculation.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Loss of cerebral autoregulation drives abnormal perfusion patterns after stroke.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- The way of life: The network challenge of blood flow in the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Snapshot 3D at the speed frontier: redefining light-field microscopy for neuroimaging.PhotoniX · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain vasculature is a multiscale network that actively regulates cerebral blood flow to maintain homeostasis. A systematic understanding of how this network enables robust and precise flow control has been hindered by the lack of understanding of flow in networks, as opposed to single vessels. To address this gap at the conceptual level, we theoretically studied nonperturbative, network-level flow responses to hydrodynamic conductance changes in individual vessels. We show vasodilation can either increase or decrease flow in the neighboring branches, yet selectively positioning the "controller" in the inflow branch of diverging nodes guarantees downstream increases in flow, regardless of surrounding network topology. Moreover, the effect of an individual vasodilation is small, so coordinated vasodilation is essential for effective regulation. To validate and refine our theoretical analysis, we developed a computational framework to analyze individual blood cell motion captured by confocal light field microscopy. This approach enabled tracking over one million cell detections across a network of more than 3,000 interconnected branches, with 2 µm spatial and 14 ms temporal resolution. Network-based analysis uncovered significant flow fluctuations, exhibiting long-range anticorrelation in spatially separated segments. The prevalence of diverging nodes within three branches of penetrating arterioles suggests that ensheathing pericytes are optimally positioned for fine-scale flow regulation. Finally, we quantified a phase separation of blood serum and cells at diverging nodes. This revealed a stochastic partition ratio with a nonlinear dependence on local hemodynamics. Collectively, our work highlights principles of organization for the control of blood flow among the seemingly random connectivity of brain microvessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.