ArticlePsychological services2026
Understanding suicide prevention services in pediatric primary care: Feedback from primary care staff.
Article in Psychological services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary care (PC) represents a widely accessed health care service for youths and families in the United States. In recent years, there has been an increase in youth presenting to PC with suicidal thoughts and behaviors. This study aims to better understand current suicide prevention practices and provider perspectives regarding suicide prevention practices in PC with pediatric populations. Two studies (one using focus groups, the other using individual interviews) were conducted with 40 PC staff (including physicians and physician assistants, integrated behavioral health staff, nurses and nurse practitioners, and clinic leaders) from pediatric PC clinics in Washington State. Focus groups/interviews elicited feedback on current suicide care practices, staff and clinic needs, barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improvement. Focus groups/interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results were similar across clinics and highlight challenges and needs for pediatric PC including time limitations, lack of resources for parents, need for additional provider training in suicide prevention, need for team-based approaches, need for standardized and streamlined pathways for patients at different risk levels, and need for integrating screening and intervention components into existing workflows. Overall, results suggest that suicide care is difficult to implement within PC contexts. Understanding PC staff needs, barriers, and facilitators is imperative to adapt feasible suicide care pathways for PC. Results highlight important needs and key components for implementation strategies to target. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.