Trial reportChinese journal of integrative medicine2026
Effectiveness and Safety of Auricular Acupressure Combined with Periocular Thumbtack Needle Therapy for Premyopic Children: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effects and safety of auricular acupressure combined with periocular thumbtack needle (AATN) therapy for premyopia children.
methodsThis multi-center, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in 8 Chinese hospitals, and 298 premyopic children aged 6 to 10 years were recruited between October 2020 and February 2022. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to the treatment group or the control group via a simple randomization method. All the participants in both groups were provided with standard intensive eye health instruction through phone calls, WeChat or hospital visits once a week, and the children in the treatment group received AATN therapy additionally. Following 12-week treatment, participants were followed up at 3-month intervals, with the entire study extending over a 9-month duration from baseline to the final assessment. The primary outcome was the mean change in spherical equivalent (SE) from baseline to 36 weeks. The secondary outcomes included the rate of children with stable myopia (MSR), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), axial length (AL), corneal curvature (CC), accommodative amplitude (AMP) and intraocular pressure (IOP) at baseline, 6,12, 24 and 36 weeks. Safety assessment included analysis of treatment-related adverse events (AEs), such as allergic reactions and skin damage.
resultsTotally, 298 children with premyopia were included, 151 in the treatment group and 147 in the control group. At the 36th week, the SE was -0.81±0.55 D in the control group and -0.65±0.44 D in the treatment group (P=0.002). The treatment group demonstrated superior SE control efficacy compared with the control group, with differences of -0.29±0.37 D and -0.49±0.44 D, respectively (P<0.01). The children in the treatment group achieved a MSR of 57.78% with more favorable outcome than 37.10% in the control group (P<0.01). The adjusted mean change in AMP from baseline to 9th month was 8.85±4.02 in the control group and 9.85±3.41 in the treatment group (P=0.018). AL increased by a mean of 0.35±0.28 mm in the control group and 0.20±0.42 mm in the treatment group (P=0.004). No significant differences in UCVA or CC were found between the two groups (P>0.05) and no AEs were reported.
conclusionAATN therapy was effective for controlling the onset of myopia and SE, enhancing ocular accommodation, and mitigating AL. (Registration No. ChiCTR2000039299).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41538119What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.