Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41538091›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater2026

[Low care burden and high self-efficacy are essential for preparing family carers to care for people with dementia-findings from the TeleCareHub project].

Michaela Defrancesco, Simone Schütz, Laetizia Debora Schrezenmeier, Markus Canazei, Verena Dresen, Laura Staller, Katrin Paldán, Burak Doganyigit

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michaela DefrancescoDepartment Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie Psychosomatik und Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie Innsbruck, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich. michaela.defrancesco@i-med.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9613-9485
Simone SchützDepartment Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie Psychosomatik und Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie Innsbruck, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich.
Laetizia Debora SchrezenmeierDepartment Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie Psychosomatik und Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie Innsbruck, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich.
Markus CanazeiInstitut für Psychologie, Leopold-Franzens Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich.
Verena DresenInstitut für Psychologie, Leopold-Franzens Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich.
Laura StallerInstitut für Psychologie, Leopold-Franzens Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich.
Katrin PaldánVorarlberg University of Applied Sciences, Dornbirn, Österreich.
Burak DoganyigitDepartment Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie Psychosomatik und Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie Innsbruck, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Österreich.

Funding

Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft FO999894108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe care and support of people with dementia (PwD) is predominantly provided by informal carers and support workers (iPuB). A high degree of preparedness for caregiving improves the care of PwD and reduces the burden of care. The development of support and information services to increase preparedness is one of the goals of the FFG-funded TeleCareHub project.

methodsIn this multicentre cross-sectional study, iPuB were examined using the following questionnaires: General Self-Efficacy Short Scale (ASKU-3), Affinity for Technology Interaction Scale (ATI-8), Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-7), Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Scale for the Quality of the Current Relationship in Caregiving (SQCRC-14) and the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale (PCS-8). Data analysis was performed using correlation, variance and linear regression analyses (including mediation and moderation models).

resultsThis study analysed data from 308 iPuBs (76% female, PCS-8: 20.8 ± 6.4). Self-efficacy (ASKU-3) and relationship quality (SQCRC-14) correlated significantly positively with preparedness (PCS-8), whereas caregiver burden (ZBI-7), loneliness (UCLA-3) and depression (PHQ-9) correlated negatively with PCS‑8. In non-burdened iPuB (ZBI-7 < 11), but not in burdened iPuB, a low ZBI‑7 score and a short duration of care were predictive of high preparedness (β = -0.318; SE = 0.077; p < 0.001). Results from SQCRC-14, ASKU‑3 and PHQ‑9 showed significant modulating effects on the PCS‑8.

conclusionThe results highlight the influence of multiple personal factors of iPuB on the feeling of preparedness for caregiving. Interventions to strengthen self-efficacy and reduce depression in iPuB, who are not yet under significant stress, could improve preparedness.

Indexed as

Caregiver burdenDementiaInformal caregiversPreparednessSelf-efficacyTechnical affinityTelecare

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.