Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41538087›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2026

Tracking persistent and resistant Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium from farm to fork: biofilm-linked risks in antibiotic resistance of isolates.

Kursat Koskeroglu, Nurhan Ertas Onmaz, Dursun Alp Gundog, Candan Gungor, Guven Gungor, Kálmán Imre, Adriana Morar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kursat KoskerogluDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Nurhan Ertas OnmazDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Türkiye. nertas@erciyes.edu.tr.
Dursun Alp GundogDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye.
Candan GungorDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Guven GungorDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bingöl University, Bingöl, 12000, Türkiye.
Kálmán ImreDepartment of Animal Production and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences ''King Mihai I'' from Timisoara, Timișoara, Romania.
Adriana MorarDepartment of Animal Production and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences ''King Mihai I'' from Timisoara, Timișoara, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, biofilm-forming ability, virulence gene profiles, and associated risk levels of Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium isolated along the farm-to-fork meat production continuum in Kayseri, Türkiye. Out of 348 samples analyzed, Enterococcus spp. were detected in 209 (60%) of the samples, of which 41 (20%) were E. faecalis and 48 (23%) were E. faecium. Both strains were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent, and 35 isolates (39%) exhibited multidrug resistance (MDR). Among the tested antibiotics, resistance rates were particularly high for tetracycline (66% in E. faecalis, 69% in E. faecium) and erythromycin (56% and 58%, respectively); resistance to vancomycin (10% in each species) and ciprofloxacin (12% in E. faecalis and 13% in E. faecium) was low but consistently occurred in combination with resistance to other antibiotics and exclusively within multidrug resistance patterns. All isolates formed biofilms, with 55% being strong producers, of which 88% carried the gelE and/or efa gene. Strong biofilm formation was correlated with higher MDR rates (51% in strong biofilm producers and 25% in weak producers), peaking at 58% in E. faecalis strong producers. Risk scoring classified up to 40% of isolates as high risk. These findings suggest that enterococci may contribute to food contamination and serve as potential reservoirs of resistance and virulence, underscoring the relevance of farm-level hygiene, rational antibiotic use, and targeted surveillance within a One Health framework.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsAnimalsFarmsMeatMicrobial Sensitivity TestsVirulenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceBiofilm formationE. faecalisE. faeciumFarm-to-fork continuumFood safety

Identifiers

PMID41538087
PMCPMC12808194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.