ArticleSpine deformity2026
Automatic radiation-free evaluation of Cobb angle for spinal curvature based on fringe projection profilometry and deep learning technology.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-art review in AI and digital technologies for spine deformity.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- Comment on "Automatic radiation-free evaluation of Cobb angle for spinal curvature based on fringe projection profilometry and deep learning technology".Spine deformity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePediatric scoliosis is the most prevalent spinal disorder, often leading to abnormal curvature and deformation of the spine. Early detection is essential for timely intervention, particularly in growing adolescents. In this study, we present a novel, fully automated, radiation-free method for Cobb angle evaluation, combining fringe projection profilometry with deep learning technologies. MATERIALS AND
methodsA three-dimensional reconstruction of the participant's back surface is achieved using a seven-step phase-shifting algorithm. Convolutional neural networks are then utilized to extract asymmetry features from the 3D surface and predict the Cobb angle, a key clinical indicator of scoliosis severity. A total of 48 participants clinically diagnosed with scoliosis based on radiographic imaging were recruited from the hospital.
resultsThe experimental results demonstrate a strong correlation between the predicted and actual Cobb angles, with a correlation coefficient of 0.94 and a coefficient of determination of 0.8796 during Adam's forward bend test. The mean time required from scanning to Cobb angle prediction is approximately 3.3 s.
conclusionsThe proposed evaluation method exhibits excellent discriminative capability and shows significant potential as an alternative to the traditional scoliometer for large-scale Cobb angle screening programs in schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.