ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2026
Spike count analysis for multiplexing inference (SCAMPI).
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Visually evoked activity and variable modulation of auditory responses in the macaque inferior colliculus.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how neurons encode multiple simultaneous stimuli is a fundamental question in neuroscience. We have previously introduced a novel theory of stochastic encoding patterns wherein a neuron's spiking activity dynamically switches among its constituent single-stimulus activity patterns when presented with multiple stimuli (Groh et al., 2024). Here, we present an enhanced, comprehensive statistical testing framework for such "multiplexing". As before, our approach evaluates whether dual-stimulus responses can be accounted for as mixtures of Poissons related to single-stimulus benchmarks. Our enhanced framework improves upon previous methods in two key ways. First, it introduces a stronger set of foils for multiplexing, including an "overreaching" category that captures overdispersed activity patterns unrelated to the single-stimulus benchmarks, reducing false detection of multiplexing. Second, it detects continuous mixtures, potentially indicating faster fluctuations - i.e. at sub-trial timescales - that would have been overlooked before. We utilize a Bayesian inference framework, considering the hypothesis with the highest posterior probability as the winner, and employ the predictive recursion marginal likelihood method for non-parametric estimation of the latent mixing distributions. Reanalysis of previous findings confirms the general observation of fluctuating activity and indicates that fluctuations may well occur on faster timescales than previously suggested. We further confirm that multiplexing is more prevalent for (a) combinations of face stimuli than for faces and non-face objects in the inferotemporal face patch system; and (b) distinct vs fused objects in the primary visual cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.