ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2026
Male Attractants in Tephritidae (Diptera) Species: A Comparative Behavioural and Electrophysiological Study.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Male attractants are widely used to detect and control Tephritidae pest species. When naturally ingested by males, these compounds modify the sex pheromone composition, enhancing male attractiveness to females and thereby increasing individual reproductive success. The evolutionary origin of this sexual selection is uncertain, as male attractants differ across species. To investigate this, we compared the olfactory responses of males from nine Tephritidae species-Bactrocera dorsalis, Bactrocera zonata, Ceratitis capitata, Ceratitis catoirii, Ceratitis quilicii, Dacus ciliatus, Dacus demmerezi, Neoceratitis cyanescens, and Zeugodacus cucurbitae-to compounds known to attract males in at least one species within the family. Using a six-way olfactometer and a high-throughput Flywalk behavioural assay, we found species-specific attraction profiles. Species were globally separated into methyl eugenol responders, cuelure responders, and non-responders, with small variations observed within the groups. Using three-point electroantennography and electropalpography, we found most compounds elicited peripheral responses in males across all species, with weak connection to behavioural preferences. Consistently, peripheral responses did not predict behavioural groups. Notably, among the two species attracted to methyl eugenol, only B. zonata showed a stronger antennal response to this compound than other species, whereas cuelure peripheral responses were weak across all species. Our findings suggest that male attraction in Tephritidae may have evolved through pre-existing signal reinterpretation in the central nervous system, leading to novel behavioural outputs. Overall, this study provides valuable behavioural and electrophysiological data for understanding olfactory mechanisms underlying responses to semiochemicals used in pest management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41537912What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.