ArticleArchives of virology2026
Evolutionary origin and demographic trajectory of tomato spotted wilt virus (Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae).
Article in Archives of virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) is a harmful pathogen that causes severe disease in tomato, pepper, and other horticultural and agronomic crops. Its genome comprises three linear single-stranded RNA molecules (segments L, M, and S), which are unequally packed in nucleocapsids. Although its genome structure and molecular mechanism of infection are well understood, the evolutionary dynamics of this virus require further analysis to determine the most probable viral ancestor, the date of divergence, the ancestral geographical source of dispersal, and the demographic history of TSWV. For this, we employed a Bayesian framework to analyze whole-genome sequences of 136 isolates of TSWV obtained from different sites worldwide with a sampling window of 35 years, and phylodynamic analysis was performed separately for segments L, M, and S. Our results showed that the mutation rates of the different genome segments ranged from 1.678 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
41537910What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.