ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025
Data assimilation for estimating time-varying reproduction numbers.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data assimilation for estimating time-varying reproduction numbers.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The time-varying basic reproduction number, R0(t), is a key epidemiological metric that quantifies the transmissibility of an infectious pathogen at time t. Accurate estimation and uncertainty quantification of R0(t) are crucial for understanding disease dynamics and informing public health decision-making. In this study, we evaluate six methods for estimating R0(t) using synthetic data generated from a stochastic Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model with imposed changes to pathogen transmissibility and empirical COVID-19 case data. The methods include ensemble filter methods and inflation techniques, which are employed to mitigate covariance underestimation and filter divergence. For synthetic data, we compare the ensemble adjustment Kalman filter (EAKF) with no inflation, fixed inflation, and adaptive inflation, and the ensemble square root smoother (EnSRS) with adaptive inflation. For empirical data, we also compare with EpiEstim and EpiFilter. Our results demonstrate that the EAKF and EnSRS methods with adaptive inflation outperform other approaches in accurately estimating R0(t), particularly in scenarios with abrupt changes in transmission rates. The adaptive inflation techniques effectively address covariance underestimation and filter divergence, leading to more robust and reliable estimates of R0(t). These findings highlight the potential of adaptive inflation methods for improving the accuracy of time-varying parameter inference, contributing to more effective public health responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.