ReviewHNO2026
[Responsible use of AI and robotics in medicine : Opportunities, challenges and perspectives for otorhinolaryngology].
Review in HNO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics are transforming the foundations of medical practice. Their integration creates new opportunities for precision, individualization and efficiency but also raises fundamental ethical questions about knowledge, responsibility and legitimacy. This article summarizes the main opportunities and risks of the use of AI and robotics in medicine and shows how these technologies reshape the epistemic, normative and social dimensions of medical practice. While numerous ethical principles and guidelines provide initial guidance, the real impact arises only when the principles are embedded in concrete clinical, institutional and procedural contexts. There are three guiding ideas that are proposed as the basis of such ethics: epistemic transparency, shared responsibility and discursive-procedural legitimacy. These form the foundation of a learning, reflective and patient-centered ethics of the responsible use of technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.