ArticleBiometrics2026
Estimating the causal effect of redlining on present-day air pollution.
Article in Biometrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies have shown associations between redlining policies (1935-1974) and present-day fine particulate matter (PM$_{2.5}$) and nitrogen dioxide (NO$_2$) air pollution concentrations. In this paper, we move beyond associations and investigate the causal effects of redlining using spatial causal inference. Redlining policies were enacted in the 1930s, so there is very limited documentation of pre-treatment covariates. Consequently, traditional methods failed to sufficiently account for unmeasured confounders, potentially biasing causal interpretations. By integrating historical redlining data with 2010 PM$_{2.5}$ and NO$_2$ concentrations, our study seeks to estimate the long-term causal impact. Our study addresses challenges with a novel spatial and non-spatial latent factor framework, using the unemployment rate, house rent and percentage of Black population in 1940 US Census as proxies to reconstruct pre-treatment latent socio-economic status. We establish identification of a causal effect under broad assumptions, and use Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo to quantify uncertainty. Our causal analysis provides evidence that historically redlined neighborhoods are exposed to notably higher NO$_2$ concentration. In contrast, the disparities in PM$_{2.5}$ between these neighborhoods are less pronounced. Among the cities analyzed, Los Angeles, CA, and Atlanta, GA, demonstrate the most significant effects for both NO$_2$ and PM$_{2.5}$.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.