ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2026
A modeling-based framework to evaluate forgiveness of tuberculosis treatment in a BALB/c relapsing mouse model.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A stochastic simulation-based approach to inform the relapsing mouse model study design for non-clinical assessment of tuberculosis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of death due to an infectious agent. Adherence to long and complex TB treatments is supported by methods including directly observed therapy. The negative impact of missed drug doses on clinical outcomes is well established, highlighting both the importance of adherence support and methods to quantify the ability of a regimen to continue exerting a biologic effect during gaps in dosing known as treatment "forgiveness." To explore the value of the BALB/c relapsing mouse model of TB in evaluating treatment forgiveness, we assessed the impact of weekend dose holidays on the bactericidal efficacy, including CFU and RS ratio reduction and sterilizing efficacy, of RHZE/RH and BPaMZ. The cure/relapse data from this study, plus multiple historical studies, were used to identify a nonlinear mixed-effects Emax model that was then used to estimate time to cure 50% and derive time to cure 90% of mice (T90). The expected time-dependent bactericidal activity and reductions in RS ratio were observed for both treatments, with more rapid decreases for the BPaMZ groups. The weekend dosing holiday significantly decreased reductions in lung CFU and RS ratio earlier in RHZE/RH treatment, but no such effect was observed for BPaMZ. Similarly, the predicted T90 was significantly greater for RHZE/RH (but not BPaMZ), with weekend doses omitted. No major drug exposure difference was observed between the two dosing schedules. Our results suggest that BPaMZ is more forgiving of missed doses than RHZE/RH and demonstrate the utility of this methodology to support the evaluation of TB treatment forgiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.