ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2026
Cryptococcal antigen titers and semi-quantitative assay scores among people with HIV-associated cryptococcal antigenemia.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Improving Access to Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnostics and Treatment in Malawi.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Ten years on: Ongoing challenges in screening for cryptococcal antigenaemia in people with advanced HIV disease in South Africa.Southern African journal of HIV medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While South African guidelines recommend a lumbar puncture (LP) to exclude cryptococcal meningitis (CM) among all people with a newly positive cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) test, irrespective of CM symptoms, this is not always feasible. High blood CrAg lateral flow assay (LFA) titers are associated with concurrent CM and increased mortality. Single-strip CrAg semi-quantitative (SQ) tests could risk-stratify people with antigenemia. Consecutive fresh LFA-positive remnant plasma samples from a CD4 laboratory network collected between April and July 2021 were retested. We described LFA titers, CrAgSQ scores, and the proportion with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected 28 days before or after a positive CrAg screening test. Of 2,240 re-tested plasma samples from unique patients, 2,166 (97%) were confirmed LFA-positive. The median LFA titer was 640 (IQR, 40-5,120), 63% (1,354/2,166) had a titer of ≥160, and 52% (1,124/2,166) had SQ scores of ≥3+. Only 31% (662/2,166) had a CSF sample collected 28 days before or after a CrAg LFA-positive test; 60% (398/662) had confirmed CM. More than half of the people with cryptococcal antigenemia had a blood CrAg titer of ≥160 or a CrAgSQ score of ≥3+, both previously shown to confer a high risk of concurrent CM. Of 3 in 10 who had an LP, most had CM, suggesting that meningitis symptoms prompted LP. Healthcare worker support/training is required to improve adherence to the universal LP recommendation. When immediate LP is not feasible, blood CrAgSQ testing can rapidly identify people at the highest risk of CM who require urgent referral for LP. IMPORTANCE: A majority of patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal antigenemia identified through a large screening program in South Africa had high cryptococcal antigen titers and thus an elevated risk of concurrent meningitis and death. Despite this, a relatively small proportion had a lumbar puncture to definitively exclude meningitis. Routine CrAg semi-quantification can help to stratify patients at higher risk for meningitis and guide clinicians' management, but performing a full range of titers for all CrAg-positive blood samples increases costs and is labor-intensive. An alternative approach is to use a single test strip, which yields a semi-quantitative score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.